The prosecution’s case was light on forensics, and relied heavily on testimony from onetime sidekick Alexander Bradley, who said he was with Hernandez during the fatal filming .
Bradley, who received exemption to certify, said that Hernandez became angry one night out when a serviceman bumped into him at a nightclub and spilled his drinking. Later that night, Hernandez required Bradley to drive up next to that man’s backpack vehicle at a stop lamp .
“Yo, ” Hernandez articulated out of the window, according to Bradley. “What’s up now, n *****? “
Hernandez leaned across Bradley and shelled five films into the other car, Bradley testified. Two immigrants from Cape Verde, Safiro Furtado and Daniel de Abreu, were killed in the filming .
In closing statements, prosecutors presented Hernandez as a cold-blooded executioner
who committed an act of “senseless violence” by firing into a packed car .
“That killer made please in what he did that night, ” Patrick Haggan, the produce attorney in the case provided for, articulated. “He required his scapegoats to see it coming.”
After the shooting, Bradley sped away from the place and he and Hernandez agreed to keep their speaks slammed about the killed, Bradley articulated .
Investigators had few contributes and the dispute moved coldnes. A month eventually, Hernandez signed a $40 million contract increase with the New England Patriots
Bradley and Hernandez remained close friends until a viciou falling out a few months later at a party in Florida. Hernandez had become exceedingly nervous, Bradley testified, and he began to believe that Bradley could not keep the filming trade secrets .
After a night out in February 2013, Hernandez shot Bradley between the eyes and left him in a parking lot to expire, Bradley testified. Bradley subsisted but lost his right seeing, and he vowed revenge on his former sidekick, he articulated .
Bradley’s credibility — or need thereof — played a major role in the tribulation. Defense attorney Jose Baez frequently called him a liar and a vicious crook who had made up the narration to protect himself. Baez mockingly called Bradley’s immunity agreement the “deal of the century.”
“This guy has an incentive, and all of this is lies, ” Baez said in closing statements .
On the stand, Bradley admitted to a long autobiography of sometimes-violent medicine coping over more than a decade. He is currently imprisoned for shooting up a club in Hartford, Connecticut in an unrelated occurrence .
Prosecutors presented some evidence that contradicted parts of Bradley’s testimony. Nonetheless, they argued that those “minor inconsistencies” attested Bradley told what he believed to be the truth, rather than a form of contests put together by counsels or police .
Bradley, counsels reasoned, created the narration together but was not the only sign in the case provided for .
Investigators discovered the “murder car, ” a silver-tongued Toyota 4Runner with Rhode Island dishes, hidden away at Hernandez’s cousin’s home. The “murder weapon” was found on person or persons are attached to Hernandez as well, counsels articulated, and cell phone professionals articulated Hernandez’s phone was nearby at the time of the filming .
Finally, counsels pointed to Hernandez’s tattoos as confessions of such crimes. One of his tattoos was a shoot similar to the murder artillery with precisely five bullets, the same numeral as were fired in the 2012 filming .
Another tattoo was a head-on view of a shoot, similar to what Bradley would have construed before he was shot. Next to both of those tattoos was a scrawl of text decipher “God forgives.”
“That is not random. That is not art. That is testify, ” Haggan articulated. “That is a confession.”
Read more: http :// www.cnn.com/ 2017/04/ 14/ us/ aaron-hernandez-verdict/ index.html